Skip to content

refactor: reduce code duplication in FloodFill #1645

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

vil02
Copy link
Member

@vil02 vil02 commented Mar 25, 2024

Open in Gitpod know more

Describe your change:

This PR reduced the code duplication and adds missing tests.

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new JavaScript files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames should use the UpperCamelCase (PascalCase) style. There should be no spaces in filenames.
    Example:UserProfile.js is allowed but userprofile.js,Userprofile.js,user-Profile.js,userProfile.js are not
  • All new algorithms have a URL in their comments that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.

@vil02 vil02 marked this pull request as ready for review March 25, 2024 19:47
appgurueu
appgurueu previously approved these changes Mar 26, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@appgurueu appgurueu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You could also consider making checkLocation return a boolean - it could return whether the location is valid.

Then you'd be duplicating the two throws (but this is actually not that bad, because such side effects being "hidden" in a function may be a bit surprising).

You would then be able to deduplicate the x >= 0 && x < rgbData.length && y >= 0 && y < rgbData[0].length bounds check as well.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.08%. Comparing base (bd34e9f) to head (1be1853).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1645      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.07%   84.08%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         375      375              
  Lines       19688    19685       -3     
  Branches     2913     2917       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits        16552    16553       +1     
+ Misses       3136     3132       -4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@appgurueu appgurueu force-pushed the reduce_code_duplication_in_flood_fill branch from f405dde to 1be1853 Compare March 27, 2024 10:13
@vil02
Copy link
Member Author

vil02 commented Mar 27, 2024

@appgurueu thanks for 1be1853.

@vil02 vil02 changed the title refactor: reduce code duplication by adding checkLocation to FloodFill refactor: reduce code duplication in FloodFill Mar 27, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@appgurueu appgurueu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, I forgot to approve, didn't I...

@raklaptudirm raklaptudirm merged commit d920e7f into TheAlgorithms:master Apr 3, 2024
3 checks passed
@vil02 vil02 deleted the reduce_code_duplication_in_flood_fill branch April 3, 2024 16:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants